‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’ Moving To March 2013 To Add 3D For Bigger Foreign Box Office

EXCLUSIVE: The sequel G.I. Joe: Retaliation was supposed to come out GI Joe Retaliation Release Datethis summer on June 29th. But I’ve learned that Paramount is moving the movie nine months to March 29, 2013, to add 3D. “We’re going to do a conscientious 3D job because we’ve seen how it can better box office internationally,” one of the studio execs just told me. “Jim Cameron did all of Titanic‘s 3D in post — and look how well that movie turned out.” Hollywood is shocked that Paramount vacated the primo date, especially because Paramount blew a wad on a Super Bowl commercial and already was starting TV and outdoor ads for GI Joe 2. Paramount has had luck delaying films before: its decision to move Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island gave the director his biggest box office hit ever. And right now, 3D is huge internationally, with Russia and China building new 3D theaters by the week. Also the execs say that the blockbuster performance of The Hunger Games shows that March can be a prime time of the year to release movies. Of course, Paramount had to talk its partners on GI Joe 2 into the extra nine months of carrying costs – MGM, which has 25%, and David Ellison’s Skydance, which has another 25%. The $125M-budgeted actioner stars Channing Tatum, Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson, and Bruce Willis and is directed by Jon Chu.

Related: G.I. Joe: Retaliation Release Date: The REAL Reason For The Delay

Seth MacFarlane’s ‘Ted’ Moving Into June 29th Slot Just Vacated By ‘G.I. Joe 2′

Comments (166)

  • NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by Joshua — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:27pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • I was so looking forward to this next month. Now I have to wait til next year. Grrr. 3D blows…

      Comment by Cecil — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 3:17pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Don’t feel like reading all 50+ comments, but am I the only one thinking they did this after seeing a cut of the movie and it sucked? Realizing Americans wouldn’t watch they’re trying to appeal to a foreign audience to recoup money. Look at Battleship. Tons of money oversees but nothing here in North America because the movie blows.

        Comment by Art Vandelay — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 6:35pm PDT  Reply to this post
        • One site is reporting that the last focus group was asked, “Would you like to see more of Channing Tatum?” I think the 3D conversion is an excuse to do reshoots for a movie that’s testing badly. Maybe Channing’s sudden surge in popularity is going to rescue their sinking ship. We’ll know for sure if the new movie posters feature Tatum.

          Comment by Beatrix Kiddo — Friday May 25, 2012 @ 3:12pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Are you kidding me?! The first one sucked so bad it almost tore my clothes off. I honestly forgot everything about the movie before I reached the parking lot.

        And this? The sequel looks equally terrible. And I loved GI Joe toys and cartoons when I was a kid.

        Nobody dumps that much P&A down the drain 5 weeks from opening weekend. Nobody. Their BS excuse about Titanic doing well in 3D, c’mon. Sorry, guys, but Titanic this movie ain’t. I can a hear a bomb ticking…

        And all they did was reset the timer.

        Comment by Jack — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 9:51pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • Really? You were that looking forward to this?

      Comment by Anne B. — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 4:35pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • Yeah, this is code for “Somethings horribly wrong with this picture and we need more time to fix it”.

      Comment by Frank — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 9:07pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Thank you – Someone who knows what they’re talking about…

        It must be an even bigger trainwreck than expected. 1st Q is a dumping ground for bad movies; Lionsgate may have inverted that trend with the giant HUNGER GAMES but there’s no comparison.

        Terrible material, pure cheese, and an overmatched director FTW.

        Comment by dwayne o — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 2:14pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • I am mad, really mad. Ok, not really, was really wanting to watch this movie next month, now it will be on when my favorite book’s movie is coming out. Which movie do you think I will watch now, not this one,someone out there better be listening to us, I think you pissed off alot of Americans by wanting more money overseas.

      Comment by Shelley McKey — Monday May 28, 2012 @ 9:04am PDT  Reply to this post
  • I actually think that’s a smart move. This summer is feeling crowded. 3D really does have an impact globally.

    Comment by Yeah — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:28pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • I think it’s one of the idiotic decision in movie history, if they wanted the film to have less competition, why not just delay it until early September? there’s practically no competition then, I could see it thriving extremely well then. But this boneheaded decision is only going to encourage people to pirate the film in protest, and I can hardly blame them.

      I started a petition for Paramount to cancel it’s conversion and release the film on time. Not sure if it will be very succesful, but hey you never know unless you try right? G.I. Joe fans please sign here: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/stop-paramount-from-delaying-and-converting-g-i-joe-re.html

      P.S. I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if this film gets leaked early like X-Men Origins Wolverine did, if it does get leaked and my petition dosen’t work out, then I shall watch the film online in protest, not the best way to watch a movie, but it still beats crappy post-conversion 3-D ANY day of the week.

      Comment by Michael Prymula — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 9:33pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Really? You started a petition? Two thumbs up to the man with the plan to save the world by bringing G.I. Joe to theatres this summer instead of next….

        Comment by joe — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 8:28am PDT  Reply to this post
      • Hope that’s not your real name in your signature. Otherwise posting that last paragraph on Deadline = not smart.

        Comment by Paul — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 10:24am PDT  Reply to this post
      • I think it goes to show just how much 3D nowadays plays into more money or not at the box office come opening day.But honestly,I don’t know if I am more pissed off that they moved it to 2013,or the fact that it’s being converted into 3D.In either case,I’m not going to go see it.It’s a shame that hollywood wants to bombard us moviegoers with a format that’s not really impressive.(Note To Hollywood-The 3D only works for a movie with a lot of visuals,like Tron:Legacy).

        Comment by arione clinton — Friday May 25, 2012 @ 1:41am PDT  Reply to this post
      • I signed against this terrible planning by Paramount.

        Comment by Shadowhawk — Wednesday June 6, 2012 @ 12:05am PDT  Reply to this post
    • Yeah but we needed at least one action movie that didn’t have aliens in it.

      Comment by Charles — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 2:04am PDT  Reply to this post
  • Very smart choice. Paramount tends to be bold with these kinds of moves.

    Didn’t they do that with Mission Impossible 4 as well?

    Comment by HT — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:29pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • no. no they didnt. it came out in December and in 2D. and that did awesome at the box office.

      Comment by zac — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 3:10pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • Everyone is running from the avengers

    Comment by Whedonite — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:30pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • AVENGERS would not be relevant on 6/29, so no.

      Comment by Dorian — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 2:36pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Avengers is always relevant, blasphemer.

        Comment by nick — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 5:34pm PDT  Reply to this post
        • Not when it won’t even be OUT when this movie was originally scheduled to open, duh.

          Comment by chikalis — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 10:26am PDT  Reply to this post
    • Nah, last weekend was the final weekend Avengers will spend at #1. By June 29th, it won’t be a factor.

      Comment by Bob — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 10:50pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • True. Did they think it would get pounded by Spiderman? I mean it will be clear of Avengers and have a few weeks to make money before the Dark Knight. It’s not like they could have been expecting legs?

        Very strange.

        Comment by Katherine — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 5:55am PDT  Reply to this post
  • Well that is super disappointing. I was looking forward to it this summer in regularD :/ which is how I will be seeing it anyway I guess come next March…

    Comment by Snake...eyes — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:36pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • Hilarious and dumb of Paramount to do this before the films release especially when the movie is ready to be seen. This will bite them in the ass just wait. Mess around with the audience saying its coming this summer with trailers and tv spots only to delay it till next year to add 3D. Very very dumb

    Comment by Farzan — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:37pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • Something must be very, very wrong. Can’t remember a movie a month out–after an extensive marketing campaign has already begun — move so suddenly and during the Summer! Are they really that scared of A-MEH-ZING SPIDER-MAN? Could it be the first ever movie that had a Superbowl spot in 2 separate Super Bowls?

    Comment by Smart choice? — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:39pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • Nothing at all to do with Spiderman but all to do with Magic Mike me thinks – they would have played on the same day.

      Also, not sure March 2013 is a good month either as Oz: The Great and The Powerful would probably eat-up that month. Really, praying it’s excellent.

      Mmmmmmmmm still GI Joe, all that marketing – very very late in the day to pull it out, at least now Channing Tatum can join in the promotional fun.

      Comment by mjrules — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 3:30pm PDT  Reply to this post
      • Magic Mike will be a flop.

        Comment by Dean — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 6:43pm PDT  Reply to this post
        • You keep telling yourself that.

          Comment by srsly — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 7:55am PDT  Reply to this post
        • NNNNNNOOOOOO way, that’s going to happen. How much did The Vow make.

          Magic Mike will be a sure fire Hit for sure.

          Comment by mjrules — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 8:11am PDT  Reply to this post
        • It’s a pretty cheap movie and thus should be able to clear profitability via attendance from Channing fans alone. Rentals/VOD should be pure profit.

          Comment by Sean — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 10:31am PDT  Reply to this post
    • yeah, to me this sounds really wierd. It feels like they know the movie is really bad and just because it is big and expensive there is no guarantee that it will make money. Look at Battleship. So instead of opening to 25 million and then doing a little bit overseas and losing money for the studio they are pushing it to next year. I wouldn’t be surprised if they roll out international first, in 3-D, to make at least some of their money back before they dump it here. Sounds like it is a real turkey to me. Or at least Paramounts actions seem to be signaling that.

      Comment by wga writer — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 4:00pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • Saw the movie at a special screening a few weeks back, movie was way better then 1st. Rock, rocks!

    Go Joe!

    Comment by Anonymous — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:40pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • Your Paramount check is in the mail.

      Comment by gimme the cash — Thursday May 24, 2012 @ 6:20pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • They did the same with Star Trek, and that also seemed to work out well for them.

    Comment by MattR — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:43pm PDT  Reply to this post
  • Could be a smart move. Paramount probably doesn’t want it to get bludgeoned by Spider-Man a week later and Dark Knight after that, although this is pretty odd seeing as we’re only ONE MONTH out before the original release date.

    Comment by Jeff — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 1:43pm PDT  Reply to this post
    • I was just going to say the same thing about moving it away from The Amazing Spider-Man and The Dark Knight Rises, but March of next year? Why not around the Thanksgiving/Xmas holidays?

      Comment by 728huey — Wednesday May 23, 2012 @ 7:16pm PDT  Reply to this post
  |  More Comments

Post a Comment

Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, don't get your facts wrong, and don't bore me.